Page 1

Friday, August 29, 2008

Ayers: Terrorist Mentor to Obamessiah

The Obamessiah's political career was launched at the Ayers kitchen table... this is another one of those "DUH, I didn't know he was like that" moments.

The Obamessiah says all that stuff is ancient history (that Weather Underground Terrorist stuff) and that Bill Ayers is a swell guy. The past is past and even though Ayers is unrepentent, the Obamessiah has given him absolution and told him to sin no more (a plenary lifetime indulgence for Ayers) while receiving instructions in Chicago Thug Politics and the Saul Alinski method of socialist political action.

Cross posted from WorldNetDaily.com

Obama warns stations not to air 'radical' ad

Lawyer's letter, appeal to Justice evoke Kerry's attempt to quash Swift Boat vets

The spot by the American Issues Project questions Obama's ties to William Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground organization who boasted of a series of bomb attacks at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol four decades ago.

Sen. Barack Obama is warning TV stations and asking the Justice Department to intervene in an attempt to block the airing of an ad by a non-profit group that links him to an unrepentant domestic terrorist.

The spot by the American Issues Project questions Obama's ties to William Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground organization who boasted of a series of bomb attacks at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol four decades ago.

The Associated Press said Obama's "going-for-the-jugular approach" was the kind of response many Democrats complained Sen. John Kerry lacked when he was confronted with the charges of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth during the 2004 presidential campaign.

[continue reading]

Technorati Tags:, , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Posted by James Foley at 1:16 PM EDT
Edited on: Friday, August 29, 2008 1:20 PM EDT

Categories: 2008 election info, appeasers, hypocrits, and traitors, Cross Posts (Yahoo, VDare, etc.), Democrat Wackiness and Hypocrisy, Obama - The Obamessiah


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Page 1

Thursday, August 28, 2008

The Obamessiah to accept homage at his temple

Cross posted from Newsmax.com

Here is the Obama they want us to worship

McCain Camp Mocks "Temple of Obama"

by Rick Pedraza

Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign has released a memo mocking Democrat rival Barack Obama’s decision to decorate the stage he will give his acceptance speech tonight on as the “Temple of Obama.”

The memo, titled "Proper Attire for the Temple of Obama (The Barackopolis)," pokes fun at the neoclassical-style stage Britney Spears’ set supervisor Bobby Allen designed for the elaborate event at 75,000-seat Invesco Field, home of the NFL’s Denver Broncos.

"It's only appropriate that Barack Obama would descend down from the heavens and spend a little time with us mere mortals when accepting the Democratic nomination," Republican National Committee spokesman Danny Diaz tells the New York Post.

“We're trying to do something new," said a senior Obama campaign aide, noting that Obama is taking a page from the campaign book of John Kennedy, who in 1960 delivered his acceptance speech to 80,000 people in the Los Angeles Coliseum.

Allen, the stage supervisor for Spears and several other rock stars, tells The Post he designed the set more to evoke images of the White House and the Lincoln Memorial, not the Acropolis.

"We've done Britney's sets and a whole bunch of rock shows,” Allen said, “but this was far more elaborate and complicated and we had to do it in far less time."

Once Obama speaks, confetti will rain down on him and fireworks will be fired off from locations around the stadium wall, according to an Associated Press report.

"We would have expected to read something like this in The Onion,” a McCain adviser mockingly told The Post. “Fortunately for us, it's true. Unfortunately for Obama, it's true."

[to read the whole article click HERE]

...and here is the Obamessiah that the US will get.

Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Neil Boortz, other conservatives, you will accept my mark or cease to exist!

Technorati Tags:,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Posted by James Foley at 5:29 PM EDT
Edited on: Thursday, August 28, 2008 5:33 PM EDT

Categories: 2008 election info, Blogs, Forums, and The Media, Cross Posts (Yahoo, VDare, etc.), Democrat Wackiness and Hypocrisy, Obama - The Obamessiah


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Firefox 3.0.1 BUGGY!!! Don't waste your time on it.

I was using Firefox 2.0.16 yesterday when a box opened up saying that the NEW Firefox 3.0.1 was available and they thought I MUST upgrade for security and other unspecified reasons. So I hit the button to download the "upgrade", then installed it.

In Firefox 2.x versions you can clear the cache and all is well. There is a plugin for Firefox that makes it easy to sweep out the cache. Firefox doesn't even hiccup after clearing the cache.

Try that in Firefox 3.x

FF3 froze up and started using 100% of the processor, but I finally got the program manager to come up after a minute or two.

I couldn't get the program managerto dump it so i did a reboot through the PM.

After the reboot I tried to bring up Firefox3. It went into 100% cycle mode and after a several minutes, I rebooted with the PM once again.

After reboot, I uninstalled FF3.0.1, used CrapCleaner to clean out all the misc. crap hiding in places you might never think to look, then a quick run of Uniblue Registry Booster to clean things up followed by Norton WinDoctor (both always report finding something in the registry to fix), another reboot and then I reinstalled FF 2.0.16...

I think that version 3 needs some more shaking out before I will try it again. Maybe somewhere in the ver. 3.5 range?

Technorati Tags:, ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Posted by James Foley at 5:43 AM EDT

Categories: Computers and other high tech


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Page 1

Monday, August 25, 2008

Obama's birth certificate - A FORGERY

Democrats are proving to be poor forgers. They tried to use forgery to discredit President Bush. Now from MoveOnKoSoroStryker (the KOS wing) we get a forged birth certificate for Barry Obamessiah. [note: the page has been cached if it should dissapear from the KOS web page]

I just had a thought... maybe the real Barack Obama was aborted and this person claiming to be him is a stand-in? Makes you say HMMMM.

Where was the person identified as Barack Hussein Obama really born?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616 - [cache]

and the analysis at Atlas Shrugs/Pamela Geller proving that the KOS/Obama birth certificate is a FORGERY.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/ 2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

Sunday, July 20, 2008

ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FINAL REPORT ON OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN

Techdude delivers a final report that exceeds my wildest expectations. It is irrefutable, empirical evidence - Obama's birth certificate is a forgery. Why? Why a COLB (certificate of live birth)  forgery? That is the question.

My deepest thanks and appreciation for Techdude's unwavering commitment to the truth despite the threats and harassment, the slashed tires and the dead animal on his porch.

Insofar as "techdude's" credentials, he is an active member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, American College of Forensic Examiners, The International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, International Information Systems Forensics Association - the list goes on. He also a board certified as a forensic computer examiner, a certificated legal investigator, and a licensed private investigator. He has been performing computer based forensic investigations since 1993 (although back then it did not even have a formal name yet) and he has performed countless investigations since then.

Here is his analysis:

Obama’s Birth Certificate – CHANGE you can believe in.

I have decided to leave out the low level technicalities and the how-to section of this report due to a lack of time and more importantly I want to get the facts out as quickly as possible.

[continue]

===

note: I found another blog that has investigated the possible source and identity of the forger.

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/ daily-kos-an-obama- activist-and- forged-birth-certifications/

Technorati Tags:, , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Posted by James Foley at 10:33 AM EDT
Edited on: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:05 AM EDT

Categories: 2008 election info, appeasers, hypocrits, and traitors, Corrupt Politicians (Bought Politicians), Cross Posts (Yahoo, VDare, etc.), Democrat Wackiness and Hypocrisy, Obama - The Obamessiah


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Page 1

Monday, August 18, 2008

The Obamessiah supports infanticide!

The Obamessiah supports infanticide. Links below show that he maintained his 100% pro-abortion record in the Illinois legislature.

[Images of the high sacrament (abortion) of the Obamessiah]

Yes, the Obamessiah did vote to kill live born babies that survived a botched abortion!

For further information, contact:
Douglas Johnson, Legislative Director
Susan Muskett, J.D., Legislative Counsel
National Right to Life Committee
512-10th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
202-626-8820
 
 
Obama Cover-up Revealed On Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Bill

The following statement was issued on Monday, August 11, 2008, by the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) in Washington, D.C.

 
New documents just obtained by NRLC, and linked below, prove that Senator Obama has for the past four years blatantly misrepresented his actions on the Illinois Born-Alive Infants Protection bill.
 
Summary and comment by NRLC spokesman Douglas Johnson:  "Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an Illinois state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion -- even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion.  Obama's legislative actions in 2003 -- denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions -- were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress.   The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose."

In 2000, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (BAIPA) was first introduced in Congress.  This was a two-paragraph bill intended to clarify that any baby who is entirely expelled from his or her mother, and who shows any signs of life, is to be regarded as a legal "person" for all federal law purposes, whether or not the baby was born during an attempted abortion.  (To view the original 2000 BAIPA, click here.)

In 2002, the bill was enacted, after a "neutrality clause" was added to explicitly state that the bill expressed no judgment, in either direction, about the legal status of a human prior to live birth.  (The "neutrality" clause read, “Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being ‘born alive’ as defined in this section.”)  The bill passed without a dissenting vote in either house of Congress.  (To view the final federal BAIPA as enacted, click here.  To view a chronology of events pertaining to the federal BAIPA, click here.)

Meanwhile, Barack Obama, as a member of the Illinois State Senate, actively opposed a state version of the BAIPA during three successive regular legislative sessions.  His opposition to the state legislation continued into 2003 -- even after NARAL had withdrawn its initial opposition to the federal bill, and after the final federal bill had been enacted in August 2002.

When Obama was running for the U.S. Senate in 2004, his Republican opponent criticized him for supporting "infanticide."  Obama countered this charge by claiming that he had opposed the state BAIPA because it lacked the pre-birth neutrality clause that had been added to the federal bill.  As the Chicago Tribune reported on October 4, 2004, "Obama said that had he been in the U.S. Senate two years ago, he would have voted for the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, even though he voted against a state version of the proposal.  The federal version was approved; the state version was not.  . . . The difference between the state and federal versions, Obama explained, was that the state measure lacked the federal language clarifying that the act would not be used to undermine Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court opinion that legalized abortion."

During Obama's 2008 run for President, his campaign and his defenders have asserted repeatedly and forcefully that it is a distortion, or even a smear, to suggest that Obama opposed a state born-alive bill that was the same as the federal bill.  See, for example, this June 30, 2008 "factcheck" issued by the Obama campaign, in the form that it still appeared on the Obama website on August 7, 2008.  The Obama "cover story" has often been repeated as fact, or at least without challenge, in major organs of the news media.  (Two recent examples:  CNN reported on June 30, 2008, "Senator Obama says if he had been in the U.S. Senate in 2002, he, too, would have voted in favor of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act because unlike the Illinois bill, it included language protecting Roe v. Wade." The New York Times reported in a story on August 7, 2008 that Obama "said he had opposed the bill because it was poorly drafted and would have threatened the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade that established abortion as a constitutional right.  He said he would have voted for a similar bill that passed the United States Senate because it did not have the same constitutional flaw as the Illinois bill.")

National Right to Life and other pro-life observers have always regarded Obama's "defense" as contrived, since the original two-paragraph BAIPA on its face applied only after a live birth; the "neutrality clause" added in 2001 merely made this explicit, and therefore the new clause did not change the substance of the original bill.

Moreover, the overwhelming majority of liberal, pro-abortion members of the U.S. House of Representatives did not embrace the initial NARAL position that the original bill was an attack on Roe v. Wade.  The Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee, then as now, were a solidly liberal group, yet only one of them voted against the original BAIPA, without the "neutrality clause," and he cited a different reason.  Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), who supported the bill and who described himself as "as pro-choice as anybody on Earth" -- argued that under his understanding of Roe "if an abortion is performed, or a natural birth occurred, at any age, [even] three months, and the product of that was living outside the mother, and somebody came and shot him, I don't think there's any doubt that person would be prosecuted for murder."  When the original bill -- with no "neutrality clause" -- came up on the House floor on September 26, 2000, it passed 380-15.

These facts should give pause to those who have unskeptically accepted Obama's claim that the Illinois BAIPA bills that he opposed in 2001 and 2002, which were modeled on the original federal BAIPA, were crafted to attack Roe v. Wade.

For the moment we can set that debate aside, however, for this reason:  Documents obtained by NRLC now demonstrate conclusively that Obama's entire defense is based on a brazen factual misrepresentation. 

The documents prove that in March 2003, state Senator Obama, then the chairman of the Illinois state Senate Health and Human Services Committee, presided over a committee meeting in which the "neutrality clause" (copied verbatim from the federal bill) was added to the state BAIPA, with Obama voting in support of adding the revision.  Yet, immediately afterwards, Obama led the committee Democrats in voting against the amended bill, and it was killed, 6-4.

The bill that Chairman Obama killed, as amended, was virtually identical to the federal law; the only remaining differences were on minor points of bill-drafting style.  To see the language of the two bills side by side, click here.

To see the official "Senate Committee Action Report" on this meeting, click on one of the links below.  (The document is dated March 12, 2003, which is the day that the committee convened, but Chairman Obama recessed the meeting until March 13, which is the day that these votes actually occurred.)

Here are links to the official document that records these votes, in three different formats.

 

In this report, the left-hand column shows the roll call vote on adoption of "Senate Amendment No. 1," which was verbatim the neutrality clause copied from the federal bill.  The right hand column shows the roll call by which Obama and his Democratic colleagues then killed the amended bill -- the bill that was virtually identical to the federal law that Obama, starting in 2004, claimed he would have supported if he'd had the opportunity.

To view the text of SB 1082 as it was originally introduced (without the neutrality clause), click here.  To view the text of Senate Amendment No. 1 (the neutrality clause copied from the federal law), which Obama and his colleagues added to the bill at the March 13 meeting (before killing the bill), click here.

NRLC has also obtained two additional documents that report information on these events that is fully consistent with the Senate Committee Action Report.

To see the "Senate Republican Staff Analysis:  Senate Bill No. 1082,"  click here.  (If this Word document requests a password, simply hit "cancel" and it will be displayed.)  The first portion of this analysis was written before the March 12-13, 2003, meeting of the committee that Senator Obama chaired.  The committee's actions, amending the bill to exactly track the federal born-alive law, and then defeating the bill, are reported on the bottom half of the second page.)

Finally, to see an Associated Press dispatch dated March 13, 2003, reporting on the 6-4 committee vote that killed the bill, click here.

Less than two years after this meeting, Obama began to publicly claim that he opposed the state BAIPA because it lacked the "neutrality" clause, and that he would have supported the federal version (had he been a member of Congress) because it contained the "neutrality" clause.  His claim has been accepted on its face by various media outlets, producing stories that have in turn been quoted by the Obama campaign and Obama defenders in attacking anyone who asserts that Obama opposed born-alive legislation similar to the federal bill.  It has also been forcefully repeated by advocacy groups such as NARAL (see, for example, this June 30, 2008 "alert" from NARAL). 

It appears that as of August 7, 2008, only one writer -- Terence Jeffrey, a contributing editor to HumanEvents.com -- had correctly reported the essence of this story, in a column posted on January 16, 2008 (read it here), but his report was ignored by the Obama campaign and overlooked by others at the time.

Now, the uncovering of the Senate Committee Action Report and the contemporary Associated Press report shed new light on Senator Obama's four-year effort to cover up his real record of refusing to protect live-born survivors of abortion.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:


Index of Documents Regarding Obama Cover-up on Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Bill  (will be updated as new items come in)

The official report of the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, explaining the intent of the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (H.R. 2175), and explaining why such legislation was necessary (August 2, 2001)
 

Technorati Tags:,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Posted by James Foley at 6:38 AM EDT
Edited on: Friday, August 22, 2008 3:00 PM EDT

Categories: 2008 election info, abortion, Cross Posts (Yahoo, VDare, etc.), Obama - The Obamessiah


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Page 1

Sunday, August 17, 2008

Obamessiah wants to be Abortionist In Chief of the USA but says...

August 16th, 2008

Obama says pointed abortion query “above his pay grade”

Posted by: Ed Stoddard

DALLAS - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama side-stepped a pointed query about abortion on Saturday by “mega-pastor” Rick Warren during a televised forum.

Asked at what point a baby gets “human rights,” Obama, who strongly supports abortion rights, said: “… whether you’re looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question  with specificity … is above my pay grade.”

He went on to reiterate his view that it was important to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies.

[more]

===

...Above his pay grade until he is elected and ascends to his godhead position as the Obamessiah.

Translation of the above statement by Obama, "I dont need to decide. I'd kill them ALL!" (as his solution to pregnancies unwanted or otherwise...)

Obamessiah is the most liberal Senator in the US Senate. Omamessiah has a 100% pro-abortion voting record. He is recognized for this by NARAL (the National Abortion Rights Action League).

He specifically voted to allow "partial birth abortion" where the live baby is delivered feet first utill the skull still remains in the birth canal. Then the brains are sucked out, collapsing the skull.

This is the ULTIMATE sacrament to abortion lovers like Obamessiah.

Technorati Tags:, , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Posted by James Foley at 9:27 PM EDT
Edited on: Monday, August 18, 2008 6:03 AM EDT

Categories: 2008 election info, abortion, appeasers, hypocrits, and traitors, Blogs, Forums, and The Media, Cross Posts (Yahoo, VDare, etc.), Democrat Wackiness and Hypocrisy, Local, National, World News, Obama - The Obamessiah, Religion


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Page 1

Friday, August 15, 2008

The Obamessiah's Prayer

Cross posted from Hannity.com

http://www.hannity.com//Article.asp?id=840892

The "Obama" Prayer

by Matthew Kramer

[as modified by James Foley]

Our Obamessiah, who art from heaven, or Jakarta in Indonesia, or Hawaii, or possibly Chicago,

Liberal be thy name,

Thy presidency come,

Thy will be done,

On Earth, as it is in San Francisco.

Give us this day our daily handouts.

And forgive us our individualism,

As we forgive those who don't properly inflate their tires.

And lead us not into the Clintons,

But deliver us from McCain

For thine is the kingdom,

and the power, and the glory,

for two full terms.

Amen Alleluia

Technorati Tags:, ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Posted by James Foley at 1:35 AM EDT
Edited on: Friday, August 15, 2008 2:40 PM EDT

Categories: 2008 election info, Cross Posts (Yahoo, VDare, etc.), Energy (Oil, Nuke, Wind, Sun, etc.), Obama - The Obamessiah, Religion


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Page 1

Thursday, August 14, 2008

A Personal Note from John O'Neill

A note received in email from fellow a Vietnam Vet Against John Kerry and SwiftBoat Veteran, John O'Neill about the Obamessiah.

A Personal Note from John O'Neill

Dear Friend,

Over the past couple of weeks, you may have received my letters, urging you to read The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate by National Review Online political reporter David Freddoso. I am happy to say this book is now #5 on the New York Times bestseller list. But we cannot relax for a moment: Obama still leads in the polls, and this is the book every voter needs to read to learn the truth about his record.

As you may recall, I was privileged to play a role in helping prevent John Kerry from being elected president when my fellow Swift Boat Veterans and I released the book Unfit for Command. As liberal as Kerry was, America faces an even more liberal threat today: Barack Obama. And I fully believe The Case Against Barack Obama is the 2008 version of Unfit for Command and could keep Obama out of the White House.

In The Case Against Barack Obama , Freddoso uncovers the stories the mainstream media has neglected, revealing Obama for who he really is: the U.S. senator with the #1 most liberal voting record in the Senate. And a politician whose rhetoric of "change" does not match the reality of his corrupt, "Chicago-machine politics" background.

As American citizens, it is our right and duty to question the background, character, and proposals of any candidate who could be our next commander in chief. Democrats and the media are not holding Obama accountable, so conservatives must. I'm grateful to David Freddoso and my publisher, Regnery, for finally revealing the man behind the myth.

I urge you to read the New York Times bestseller The Case Against Barack Obama . I also recommend that you buy copies for your friends and relatives who may consider voting for Obama. They deserve to know the truth, too.

Please click on one of the links below to order your copy today.

Sincerely,

John O'Neill

Posted by James Foley at 6:54 PM EDT

Categories: 2008 election info, Cross Posts (Yahoo, VDare, etc.), email, Guest Editorial, Obama - The Obamessiah


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Page 1

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

GOP Senators Killing Energy Issue for Republicans and America

GOP Senators Killing Energy Issue for Republicans and America

cross posted from GOPUSA - The Loft

http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/?p=757

Posted by Bobby Eberle

August 12, 2008 at 6:26 am

Excerpts... go to the link above to read the whole article.

Last week, I wrote on efforts by House GOP members to draw attention to the fact that Nancy Pelosi sent House members home for the summer without a vote on domestic oil drilling. The American people want it, and the GOP House members are fighting for it. I also wrote on how big the energy issue is. It could be THE issue of the upcoming elections... an issue upon which Republicans could run AND win.

However, this is a new week, and whenever too much time passes, there is bound to be a new effort by the GOP to stall momentum and stab conservatives right in the heart. Who needs Democrats when so many GOP "leaders" act just like them? Now, we have the "Gang of 10." This group of senators (5 Republicans and 5 Democrats) claims to have forged a "bi-partisan energy compromise." In reality, we have a group of five GOP senators who are set on taking the winning issues of drilling and energy off the table and selling out to the liberals.

A report in Investor's Business Daily (IBD) sums up the situation perfectly: "If you thought Republicans were no longer 'The Stupid Party,' then you haven't met the senators who may have just destroyed the GOP's biggest hope this election year: the drilling issue."

IBD summarizes the issue as follows:

Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson of Georgia, Bob Corker of Tennessee, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and John Thune of South Dakota — remember their names if things go badly for the GOP this November.

With the issue of domestic drilling to provide relief for suffering consumers landing right in the laps of embattled congressional Republicans, those five — none of whom faces any immediate danger of losing his seat — decided to join with some crafty Democrats and smash to pieces that gift from the heavens.

The "compromise" they are promoting is actually a wholesale giveaway to Democrats. Touted as a drilling plan, it actually imposes about $84 billion in new taxes on oil companies and keeps the offshore and Arctic National Wildlife Refuge drilling bans.

[read the whole article]

===

We could expect no less from the RINOs in the senate, always eager to sink the GOP or complete the conversion to the Republican Neo-Democrats. After all, they will want to be able to caucus with the Democrats.

Technorati Tags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Posted by James Foley at 1:53 PM EDT
Edited on: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 1:54 PM EDT

Categories: 2008 election info, appeasers, hypocrits, and traitors, Corrupt Politicians (Bought Politicians), Cross Posts (Yahoo, VDare, etc.), Energy (Oil, Nuke, Wind, Sun, etc.), GOP (The Neo-Democrats), The RINOs


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Page 1

Monday, August 11, 2008

Server Maintenance

The server has been down for backup and assorted other maintenance today.

I now have a fresh backup of the web pages.

Everything is back online.

Posted by James Foley at 5:49 PM EDT

Categories: Computers and other high tech


PermaLink
AddThis Social Bookmark Button





Current and previous entries below the fold

Also see the PermaLinks in the sidebar for older articles of interest.