« Crapitol News | Main | Democrat Wackiness and Hypocrisy »

Monday, August 18, 2008

The Obamessiah supports infanticide!

The Obamessiah supports infanticide. Links below show that he maintained his 100% pro-abortion record in the Illinois legislature.

For further information, contact:
Douglas Johnson, Legislative Director
Susan Muskett, J.D., Legislative Counsel
National Right to Life Committee
512-10th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
202-626-8820
 
 
Obama Cover-up Revealed On Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Bill

The following statement was issued on Monday, August 11, 2008, by the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) in Washington, D.C.

 
New documents just obtained by NRLC, and linked below, prove that Senator Obama has for the past four years blatantly misrepresented his actions on the Illinois Born-Alive Infants Protection bill.
 
Summary and comment by NRLC spokesman Douglas Johnson:  "Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an Illinois state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion -- even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion.  Obama's legislative actions in 2003 -- denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions -- were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress.   The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose."

In 2000, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (BAIPA) was first introduced in Congress.  This was a two-paragraph bill intended to clarify that any baby who is entirely expelled from his or her mother, and who shows any signs of life, is to be regarded as a legal "person" for all federal law purposes, whether or not the baby was born during an attempted abortion.  (To view the original 2000 BAIPA, click here.)

In 2002, the bill was enacted, after a "neutrality clause" was added to explicitly state that the bill expressed no judgment, in either direction, about the legal status of a human prior to live birth.  (The "neutrality" clause read, “Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being ‘born alive’ as defined in this section.”)  The bill passed without a dissenting vote in either house of Congress.  (To view the final federal BAIPA as enacted, click here.  To view a chronology of events pertaining to the federal BAIPA, click here.)

Meanwhile, Barack Obama, as a member of the Illinois State Senate, actively opposed a state version of the BAIPA during three successive regular legislative sessions.  His opposition to the state legislation continued into 2003 -- even after NARAL had withdrawn its initial opposition to the federal bill, and after the final federal bill had been enacted in August 2002.

When Obama was running for the U.S. Senate in 2004, his Republican opponent criticized him for supporting "infanticide."  Obama countered this charge by claiming that he had opposed the state BAIPA because it lacked the pre-birth neutrality clause that had been added to the federal bill.  As the Chicago Tribune reported on October 4, 2004, "Obama said that had he been in the U.S. Senate two years ago, he would have voted for the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, even though he voted against a state version of the proposal.  The federal version was approved; the state version was not.  . . . The difference between the state and federal versions, Obama explained, was that the state measure lacked the federal language clarifying that the act would not be used to undermine Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court opinion that legalized abortion."

During Obama's 2008 run for President, his campaign and his defenders have asserted repeatedly and forcefully that it is a distortion, or even a smear, to suggest that Obama opposed a state born-alive bill that was the same as the federal bill.  See, for example, this June 30, 2008 "factcheck" issued by the Obama campaign, in the form that it still appeared on the Obama website on August 7, 2008.  The Obama "cover story" has often been repeated as fact, or at least without challenge, in major organs of the news media.  (Two recent examples:  CNN reported on June 30, 2008, "Senator Obama says if he had been in the U.S. Senate in 2002, he, too, would have voted in favor of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act because unlike the Illinois bill, it included language protecting Roe v. Wade." The New York Times reported in a story on August 7, 2008 that Obama "said he had opposed the bill because it was poorly drafted and would have threatened the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade that established abortion as a constitutional right.  He said he would have voted for a similar bill that passed the United States Senate because it did not have the same constitutional flaw as the Illinois bill.")

National Right to Life and other pro-life observers have always regarded Obama's "defense" as contrived, since the original two-paragraph BAIPA on its face applied only after a live birth; the "neutrality clause" added in 2001 merely made this explicit, and therefore the new clause did not change the substance of the original bill.

Moreover, the overwhelming majority of liberal, pro-abortion members of the U.S. House of Representatives did not embrace the initial NARAL position that the original bill was an attack on Roe v. Wade.  The Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee, then as now, were a solidly liberal group, yet only one of them voted against the original BAIPA, without the "neutrality clause," and he cited a different reason.  Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), who supported the bill and who described himself as "as pro-choice as anybody on Earth" -- argued that under his understanding of Roe "if an abortion is performed, or a natural birth occurred, at any age, [even] three months, and the product of that was living outside the mother, and somebody came and shot him, I don't think there's any doubt that person would be prosecuted for murder."  When the original bill -- with no "neutrality clause" -- came up on the House floor on September 26, 2000, it passed 380-15.

These facts should give pause to those who have unskeptically accepted Obama's claim that the Illinois BAIPA bills that he opposed in 2001 and 2002, which were modeled on the original federal BAIPA, were crafted to attack Roe v. Wade.

For the moment we can set that debate aside, however, for this reason:  Documents obtained by NRLC now demonstrate conclusively that Obama's entire defense is based on a brazen factual misrepresentation. 

The documents prove that in March 2003, state Senator Obama, then the chairman of the Illinois state Senate Health and Human Services Committee, presided over a committee meeting in which the "neutrality clause" (copied verbatim from the federal bill) was added to the state BAIPA, with Obama voting in support of adding the revision.  Yet, immediately afterwards, Obama led the committee Democrats in voting against the amended bill, and it was killed, 6-4.

The bill that Chairman Obama killed, as amended, was virtually identical to the federal law; the only remaining differences were on minor points of bill-drafting style.  To see the language of the two bills side by side, click here.

To see the official "Senate Committee Action Report" on this meeting, click on one of the links below.  (The document is dated March 12, 2003, which is the day that the committee convened, but Chairman Obama recessed the meeting until March 13, which is the day that these votes actually occurred.)

Here are links to the official document that records these votes, in three different formats.

 
Senate Committee Action Report in HTML (web browser) format

Senate Committee Action Report in JPG (photo) format

Senate Committee Action Report in PDF (Adobe document) format

 

In this report, the left-hand column shows the roll call vote on adoption of "Senate Amendment No. 1," which was verbatim the neutrality clause copied from the federal bill.  The right hand column shows the roll call by which Obama and his Democratic colleagues then killed the amended bill -- the bill that was virtually identical to the federal law that Obama, starting in 2004, claimed he would have supported if he'd had the opportunity.

To view the text of SB 1082 as it was originally introduced (without the neutrality clause), click here.  To view the text of Senate Amendment No. 1 (the neutrality clause copied from the federal law), which Obama and his colleagues added to the bill at the March 13 meeting (before killing the bill), click here.

NRLC has also obtained two additional documents that report information on these events that is fully consistent with the Senate Committee Action Report.

To see the "Senate Republican Staff Analysis:  Senate Bill No. 1082,"  click here.  (If this Word document requests a password, simply hit "cancel" and it will be displayed.)  The first portion of this analysis was written before the March 12-13, 2003, meeting of the committee that Senator Obama chaired.  The committee's actions, amending the bill to exactly track the federal born-alive law, and then defeating the bill, are reported on the bottom half of the second page.)

Finally, to see an Associated Press dispatch dated March 13, 2003, reporting on the 6-4 committee vote that killed the bill, click here.

Less than two years after this meeting, Obama began to publicly claim that he opposed the state BAIPA because it lacked the "neutrality" clause, and that he would have supported the federal version (had he been a member of Congress) because it contained the "neutrality" clause.  His claim has been accepted on its face by various media outlets, producing stories that have in turn been quoted by the Obama campaign and Obama defenders in attacking anyone who asserts that Obama opposed born-alive legislation similar to the federal bill.  It has also been forcefully repeated by advocacy groups such as NARAL (see, for example, this June 30, 2008 "alert" from NARAL). 

It appears that as of August 7, 2008, only one writer -- Terence Jeffrey, a contributing editor to HumanEvents.com -- had correctly reported the essence of this story, in a column posted on January 16, 2008 (read it here), but his report was ignored by the Obama campaign and overlooked by others at the time.

Now, the uncovering of the Senate Committee Action Report and the contemporary Associated Press report shed new light on Senator Obama's four-year effort to cover up his real record of refusing to protect live-born survivors of abortion.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:


Index of Documents Regarding Obama Cover-up on Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Bill  (will be updated as new items come in)

 
 
NRLC archive on the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act

NARAL press release, July 20, 2000, expressing strong opposition to the original federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (H.R. 4292).

The official report of the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, explaining the intent of the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (H.R. 2175), and explaining why such legislation was necessary (August 2, 2001)
 

Technorati Tags:,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Sunday, August 17, 2008

Obamessiah wants to be Abortionist In Chief of the USA but says...

August 16th, 2008

Obama says pointed abortion query “above his pay grade”

Posted by: Ed Stoddard

DALLAS - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama side-stepped a pointed query about abortion on Saturday by “mega-pastor” Rick Warren during a televised forum.

Asked at what point a baby gets “human rights,” Obama, who strongly supports abortion rights, said: “… whether you’re looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question  with specificity … is above my pay grade.”

He went on to reiterate his view that it was important to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies.

[more]

===

...Above his pay grade until he is elected and ascends to his godhead position as the Obamessiah.

Translation of the above statement by Obama, "I dont need to decide. I'd kill them ALL!" (as his solution to pregnancies unwanted or otherwise...)

Obamessiah is the most liberal Senator in the US Senate. Omamessiah has a 100% pro-abortion voting record. He is recognized for this by NARAL (the National Abortion Rights Action League).

He specifically voted to allow "partial birth abortion" where the live baby is delivered feet first utill the skull still remains in the birth canal. Then the brains are sucked out, collapsing the skull.

This is the ULTIMATE sacrament to abortion lovers like Obamessiah.

Technorati Tags:, , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Friday, August 15, 2008

The Obamessiah's Prayer

Cross posted from Hannity.com

http://www.hannity.com//Article.asp?id=840892

The "Obama" Prayer

by Matthew Kramer

[as modified by James Foley]

Our Obamessiah, who art from heaven, or Jakarta in Indonesia, or Hawaii, or possibly Chicago,

Liberal be thy name,

Thy presidency come,

Thy will be done,

On Earth, as it is in San Francisco.

Give us this day our daily handouts.

And forgive us our individualism,

As we forgive those who don't properly inflate their tires.

And lead us not into the Clintons,

But deliver us from McCain

For thine is the kingdom,

and the power, and the glory,

for two full terms.

Amen Alleluia

Technorati Tags:, ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Thursday, August 14, 2008

A Personal Note from John O'Neill

A note received in email from fellow a Vietnam Vet Against John Kerry and SwiftBoat Veteran, John O'Neill about the Obamessiah.

A Personal Note from John O'Neill

Dear Friend,

Over the past couple of weeks, you may have received my letters, urging you to read The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate by National Review Online political reporter David Freddoso. I am happy to say this book is now #5 on the New York Times bestseller list. But we cannot relax for a moment: Obama still leads in the polls, and this is the book every voter needs to read to learn the truth about his record.

As you may recall, I was privileged to play a role in helping prevent John Kerry from being elected president when my fellow Swift Boat Veterans and I released the book Unfit for Command. As liberal as Kerry was, America faces an even more liberal threat today: Barack Obama. And I fully believe The Case Against Barack Obama is the 2008 version of Unfit for Command and could keep Obama out of the White House.

In The Case Against Barack Obama , Freddoso uncovers the stories the mainstream media has neglected, revealing Obama for who he really is: the U.S. senator with the #1 most liberal voting record in the Senate. And a politician whose rhetoric of "change" does not match the reality of his corrupt, "Chicago-machine politics" background.

As American citizens, it is our right and duty to question the background, character, and proposals of any candidate who could be our next commander in chief. Democrats and the media are not holding Obama accountable, so conservatives must. I'm grateful to David Freddoso and my publisher, Regnery, for finally revealing the man behind the myth.

I urge you to read the New York Times bestseller The Case Against Barack Obama . I also recommend that you buy copies for your friends and relatives who may consider voting for Obama. They deserve to know the truth, too.

Please click on one of the links below to order your copy today.

Sincerely,

John O'Neill

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

GOP Senators Killing Energy Issue for Republicans and America

GOP Senators Killing Energy Issue for Republicans and America

cross posted from GOPUSA - The Loft

http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/?p=757

Posted by Bobby Eberle

August 12, 2008 at 6:26 am

Excerpts... go to the link above to read the whole article.

Last week, I wrote on efforts by House GOP members to draw attention to the fact that Nancy Pelosi sent House members home for the summer without a vote on domestic oil drilling. The American people want it, and the GOP House members are fighting for it. I also wrote on how big the energy issue is. It could be THE issue of the upcoming elections... an issue upon which Republicans could run AND win.

However, this is a new week, and whenever too much time passes, there is bound to be a new effort by the GOP to stall momentum and stab conservatives right in the heart. Who needs Democrats when so many GOP "leaders" act just like them? Now, we have the "Gang of 10." This group of senators (5 Republicans and 5 Democrats) claims to have forged a "bi-partisan energy compromise." In reality, we have a group of five GOP senators who are set on taking the winning issues of drilling and energy off the table and selling out to the liberals.

A report in Investor's Business Daily (IBD) sums up the situation perfectly: "If you thought Republicans were no longer 'The Stupid Party,' then you haven't met the senators who may have just destroyed the GOP's biggest hope this election year: the drilling issue."

IBD summarizes the issue as follows:

Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson of Georgia, Bob Corker of Tennessee, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and John Thune of South Dakota — remember their names if things go badly for the GOP this November.

With the issue of domestic drilling to provide relief for suffering consumers landing right in the laps of embattled congressional Republicans, those five — none of whom faces any immediate danger of losing his seat — decided to join with some crafty Democrats and smash to pieces that gift from the heavens.

The "compromise" they are promoting is actually a wholesale giveaway to Democrats. Touted as a drilling plan, it actually imposes about $84 billion in new taxes on oil companies and keeps the offshore and Arctic National Wildlife Refuge drilling bans.

[read the whole article]

===

We could expect no less from the RINOs in the senate, always eager to sink the GOP or complete the conversion to the Republican Neo-Democrats. After all, they will want to be able to caucus with the Democrats.

Technorati Tags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Monday, August 11, 2008

If Mark Schauer Wins, Michigan's Citizens LOSE

Cross post from RightMichigan.com

http://www.rightmichigan.com/story/2008/8/10/132017/210

Schauer: "Finding a Way" To Violate the MI Constitution

By Shell

Posted on Sun Aug 10, 2008 at 01:20:17 PM EST

I have a dog in the oncoming fight between Mark Schauer and current Representative Tim Walberg of the 7th District. Schauer wants the job, but the lengths to which he'll go to get it are disturbing. His latest proposal is to hike the royalties oil and gas companies would pay to Michigan. Currently they pay one-sixth of the gross proceeds if natural gas or oil comes from land where the state owns the mineral rights. Schauer wants to jack it up to half.

How does this violate the state Constitution?

  • Michigan's royalties from oil and gas development go to the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund, which buys land for public recreation. The fund's purpose is spelled out in the state constitution. Schauer said he's confident the Legislature can find a way to spend money from higher royalties to help develop clean and renewable energy.

Schauer wants the legislature to "find a way" to break the law and deny the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund revenue that it was constitutionally promised. In other words, let the legislature do the dirty work and keep his hands clean for the election. If he's willing to violate what the state founders set in stone on this issue, why should he stop there?

This is another great reason to re-elect Tim Walberg.

To read the comments click [here].

===

Schauer wants the legislature to bypass the constitution to divert money intended for recreational areas. They are to be diverted elsewhere for political purposes. Typical Democrats maneuvers.

Technorati Tags:, , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Election 2008 - The Border Fence - Who is FOR and AGAINST border security

This should be an important issue this election year 2008... who is for securing our borders and who is against. No surprize, the Democrats are open/no borders traitors with few exceptions (and some of these exceptions will really floor you).

In 2007, the House of Representatives voted to repeal and defund the border fence on nearly a straight party-line vote, Democrats FOR defunding, Republicans AGAINST. The amendment to defund and repeal was tucked into the appropriations legislation to conceal it.

I blogged this "The Vote against border security - The fence defunded" in December of 2007.

A YEA vote is a vote to pass the legislation defunding the fence (AGAINST Border Security).

A NAY vote is a vote against the legislation which defunds the fence (FOR Border Security).

The Roll Call vote link at GovTrack (I prefer because it can be sorted many ways):

Sorted by the VOTE YEA or NAY , or by STATE, or by PARTY

110th Congress

House Vote #1172 (Dec 17, 2007)

On agreeing to Senate amendment with 2nd House amendment: H R 2764 Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations for FY 2008

Result: Passed

Select any of the links above to follow what our elected representatives did last year. This was not passed without debate so they can not claim ignorance.

Technorati Tags:, , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Jose Medellin - Judgement Day

Cross posted from QRZ.com

Jose Medellin has been judged and convicted of murder here on earth and a few minutes after 6:00 pm CDT he will be standing before God to be judged.

Houston Chronicle

Medellin execution on after pleas fail
Mexican citizen is moved closer to death chamber despite objections
By ROSANNA RUIZ Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle

(He has been moved from Death Row to the ready room.)

Denver Post

Execution set for today for Mexican man

NUEVO LAREDO, Mexico — Texas officials cleared the way Monday for the execution of Jose Medellin, one of 51 Mexican nationals on U.S. death row, for his role with five other members of a Houston gang in the 1993 murder and rape of two teenage girls.

The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles on Monday rejected Medellin's request for a reprieve. Medellin, 33, is scheduled to die by lethal injection at 6 p.m. CDT today.


Star-Telegram

WASHINGTON — As he awaits execution Tuesday for the brutal rape and murder of two Houston teenagers 15 years ago...

Allison Castle, a spokeswoman for the governor, "This is an individual who along with five others brutally and viciously gang-raped, stomped, kicked, slashed, strangled and murdered two young teenage girls. We don’t care where you’re from. If you commit a despicable crime like this in Texas, you’ll face the ultimate penalty under our laws."

"Jose Medellin is nothing more than a poster boy for the death penalty," said Jennifer’s father, Randy Ertman, who now lives in a country residence near Somerville with Sandra, his wife of more than 30 years. "He’s been on Death Row longer than Jennifer was alive."

The execution is scheduled for after 6 p.m. Tuesday. Medellin, 33, has declined the customary last meal and nearly all media requests for interviews, said Michelle Lyons, spokeswoman for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

KHOU Channel 10 Houston

Victim’s father counts down days to Medellin’s execution

HOUSTON -- One of Houston's most notorious killers is set to die on Tuesday. And with just three days before gang-rapist Jose Medellin is scheduled to be executed, Adolfo Pena, the father of one his victims, says he's counting down the days to justice. “He is still a scumbag to me. And like I said, he deserves to die,” said Pena.



Herald Tribune

US warns of Mexico protests on day of execution

MEXICO CITY: The U.S. Embassy in Mexico is warning Americans of possible protests next week when a Mexican man is scheduled to be executed in Texas.

(What are they going to do, close the border and stop illegals from entering the US? Order all illegals in the US to sit down on the job? I wish...)

===

http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publis...le_27838.shtml

On June 24, 1993, then-18-year-old Medellín and six other young men gathered in a Houston park for a fight that served as an initiation rite into the Black and White gang. After the fight was over, the teenagers were walking along a set of nearby railroad tracks when they passed two young girls, 14-year-old Jennifer Ertman and 16-year-old Elizabeth Peña. The boys grabbed them; the two girls were raped multiple times, strangled, and left for dead.

Hanging should still be available for executing criminals!

bump-bump-bump... and another one bites the dust!

An illegal alien murderer was executed today at approximately 6:00 PM C.D.T.

Technorati Tags:, , , , , , , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Monday, August 04, 2008

Armour Thyroid or Synthroid? Your Quality of Life Hangs in the Balance!

Cross posted from:
http://daddy.typepad.com/daddyblog/2008/07/ armour-thyroid.html?cid=125194256

Armour Thyroid or Synthroid? Your Quality of Life Hangs in the Balance!

The following is not medical advice and only my personal experience. Always seek the advice of a physician before making a medical decision.

My wife is a Registered Nurse and her suggestion has made a huge improvement in my life. I was placed on Synthroid when I was 19 years old for being hypothyroid at a serious level. It was determined that I had gone undiagnosed for a significant period of time. This certainly was no fault of mine and had gone over and over again to the physician with complaints of hypothyroidism. However, I was always told that someone as young as myself and being a male made it impossible for me to be hypothyroid. My physician refused to run a TSH test. I finally demanded a test and sure enough my TSH levels were through the roof!

I was placed on Synthyroid and showed some improvement right away, however I NEVER felt 100%... [continue]

Technorati Tags:, , , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Saturday, August 02, 2008

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Taliban Allies in Congress Embolden New Fighters To Join

McCain's terrorist bill of rights, and actions of all in government and judiciary (including the supreme court) to extend citizen rights to terrorists and enemy fighters held at Club Gitmo and elsewhere, are heartening and encouraging others to step in and volunteer to fight the devil Americans in Afghanistan. They get a call from Allah (or is it Osama Obama?) to come join the fun, they get uniformed soldier rights from the US for terrorists acts, thanks to traitorous spineless weenies in the USA that care more for terrorists than the soldiers in battle.

Travel Brochure for Foreign Islamist Terrorists entering Afghanistan by way of Pakistan

"Come fight , then join your Al-Qaeda and Taliban brothers for an all expense paid vacation at sunny Club Gitmo, US Marine servants, top quality FREE food, Korans and prayer rugs supplied, free health care, free room and board, free legal representation courtesy of the communist brothers of the jihad in the USA. If you should die before reaching the Gitmo Resort, you still receive your 72 virgin goats. We ran out of sheep, women, and little boys a long time ago. It is goats or nothing... sorry. The Management"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/ 20080730/ts_nm/afghan_security_dc

More foreign fighters join Taliban in Afghanistan

By Jon Hemming, Al Reuters Correspondent [and Honorary Talibani at the front]

KABUL (Reuters) - More foreign fighters are joining the ranks of Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan as militants increasingly cross the border from Pakistan to attack Afghan and Western troops, the Afghan Defense Ministry said on Wednesday.

Afghanistan has kept up a barrage of criticism against neighbor Pakistan in the last three months, accusing Pakistani agents of being behind a string of high-profile attacks and allowing militants sanctuary along the long and porous border.

"The presence of foreign fighters is increasing, and increasingly the operations of the terrorists are led by foreigners," Defense Ministry spokesman General Mohammad Zaher Azimi told a news conference.

Afghan, NATO and U.S.-led coalition forces are struggling to contain a sharp surge in violence as the traditional summer fighting season gets into full swing.

[For more info go to the link above. If it doesn't work, cry to Yahoo. The are notorious for dead links.]

Technorati Tags:, , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Monday, July 28, 2008

McCain - 2nd George HW Bush term (Daddy Bush)

psssst - flip-flop alert

If McCain wins (minus conservatives), it will likely be a second George HW Bush term (Read My Lips, No New Taxes).

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080729/ ap_on_el_pr/ mccain_taxes_1;_ylt=ApByIeJfCaj6mI9I08RXWCrCw5R4

McCain backs off his no-new-tax pledge

By CHARLES BABINGTON AP Writer

WASHINGTON - Republican presidential candidate John McCain drew a sharp rebuke Monday from conservatives after he signaled an openness to a higher payroll tax for Social Security, contrary to previous vows not to raise taxes of any kind.

Speaking with reporters on his campaign bus on July 9, he cited a need to shore up Social Security, saying: "I cannot tell you what I would do, except to put everything on the table."

He went a step farther Sunday with his reponse on a nationally televised talk show to a question about payroll tax increases.

"There is nothing that's off the table. I have my positions, and I'll articulate them. But nothing's off the table," McCain said. "I don't want tax increases. But that doesn't mean that anything is off the table."

Indeed, McCain frequently has promised not to raise taxes.

At a July 7 town-hall meeting in Denver, he said voters faced a stark choice between him and Democrat Barack Obama.

"Sen. Obama will raise your taxes," McCain said. "I won't." [LIAR!]

===

His supporters try to say that there are glaring differences between McCain and Obamessiah. One of those differences just went "POOF", up in smoke.

Technorati Tags:, , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Obamessiah's European Priorities Don't Included Wounded Solders

While on his triumphal world tour, currently swinging through central Europe, the Obamessiah was scheduled to visit wounded soldiers for his patented faith healing CHANGE sessions involving his MSM press secretaries. Plans change because military hospitals do not allow their facilities to be used for campaign photo-ops. Hospitals are for healing, not political cred building for neophyte politicians. The Obamessiah decided to better use his time to pander to rockers at a staged concert to draw a crowd. I wonder if Obamessiah's staffers supplied pot and blow to the rocker crowd to keep'em happy? I was surprized that a riot didn't break out when he started bumping his choppers on stage instead of a band playing. A little chemical entertainment is the most likely scneario. They would cheer for more of the same. A little of the "Yeah, yeah... so shut up and let the band back on stage!"

The world is basking in the glory of the Obamessiah.

Thanks for an email tip from Erick at RedState.com

http://www.redstate.com/diaries/redstate/2008/ jul/24/ barack-obamas-priority-list/

Barack Obama's Priority list

Posted By Moe (not not Moebama) Lane

Currently, it's like this:

1). Visit wounded soldiers at Landstuhl. Make campaign speech at German Victory Column in Berlin*.

2). Visit wounded soldiers at Landstuhl. Take the evening off to go see Berlin.

3). Visit wounded soldiers at Landstuhl. Bask in the tepid, languid adoration of Paris.

4). Visit wounded soldiers at Landstuhl. Get his Presidential transition team going.

Comments:

wt259 July 24th, 2008 at 6:01 p.m. (link)

People, he wanted to go, really he did. But, no one could find a movable tele-prompter. He couldn't be expected to be able to talk to a wounded Soldier, Sailor, Marine or Airman off the cuff, and he'd have to move around as the wounded probably wouldn't be able to walk to him, one by one, to bask in the glory that is the Obamessiah.

Prodigals July 25th, 2008 at 3:54 p.m. (link)

"We have longstanding Department of Defense policy in regards to political campaigns and elections," Pentagon spokesperson Elizabeth Hibner told me (Greg Sargent). "We informed the Obama staff that he was more than welcome to visit as Senator Obama, with Senate staff. However, he could not conduct the visit with campaign staff."

that's even WORSE

Darin_H July 25th, 2008 at 4:04 p.m. (link)

"We have longstanding Department of Defense policy in regards to political campaigns and elections," Pentagon spokesperson Elizabeth Hibner told me (Greg Sargent). "We informed the Obama staff that he was more than welcome to visit as Senator Obama, with Senate staff. However, he could not conduct the visit with campaign staff."

So Senator Obama's campaign staff is more important to him than visiting wounded soldiers?

The DoD says that to me and I say, "Okay guys, hang here at the Obamaplane, this is important to me." Instead of "My staff can't go? Well, off to shopping then!"

===

I guess the foreign politicians needed to bask in his divine presence.

I wonder if there is a Vatican visit shoehorned into the Obamessiah's busy schedule. The pope would surely love to meet the Obamessiah in person and maybe kiss his wingtips.

Technorati Tags:, , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Friday, July 25, 2008

The Obamessiah and Bush Derangement Syndrome

The Obamessiah is still touring and blessing his faithfull acolytes and converts. This is bringing showers of money from those who hope to vote for him in November. He is raking in cash from people who can not be held accountable because they are not living inside the borders of the USA. FEC says Obamessiah's collection plates have brought in over a million that they know of. When the Clintons sought cash from the Chinese and other foreign sources, those were below the radar and I would bet that Obama cash handlers have plenty of that brand of action too. Here is an excerpted (and commented by me - comments in italics) report from one of Obamessiah's press release distributions, AP via:

http://www.620ktar.com/index.php?nid=46&sid=909813&r=1

Obama beats McCain in Europe donations

July 25th, 2008

By GREGORY KATZ AP Writer (and Obama Spear Carrier)

LONDON (AP) - Barack Obama's campaign has received roughly 10 times more money from declared U.S. donors living in Germany, France and Britain than his Republican rival... as he makes his first tour of the continent as the presumed...(ed: [] Democrat nominee [] Messiah of the world.)

Federal Election Commission reports show Obama has raised at least $1 million... The European totals include contributions of $200 or more from each individual as election laws do not require campaigns to itemize lesser amounts. So it's possible Obama has received money from smaller donors... (ed: who are not US citizens and not US registered voters). (ed: How is the FEC able to closely track this on contributions made in foreign countries? Are the Obamessiah acolytes counting the collection plate and giving a daily tally to the FEC?)

Obama's many backers in Europe say they are motivated by a yearning for America to once again be viewed with respect by the rest of the world. (ed: This means that they want us to join the growing number of countries under socialist rule to become a World Union of Socialist Republics.)

The disparity between the two candidates underscores the Democratic candidate's appeal on a continent where Obamamania seems to have taken hold of expatriates and Europeans alike.

Obama has been much more sophisticated about Internet usage, and when you live overseas that's the easiest way to contribute. (ed: The internet makes election year fraud much easier to do and harder to trace. Thank Algore.)

Each donor is permitted to give a maximum of $2,300 for each election, but since the primaries are regarded as a separate election, a person can make two separate donations of $2,300 before the general election in November. While some gave the maximum, others made contributions in the $10 and $25 range.

(ed: This kinda makes you sit back and say "hmmmmm" as you ponder the fact that now we have the Fieger Precedent. Geoffy was able to get underlings and associates to donate large sums of cash (over $100,000) to Democrat causes and then reimburse them to disguise the source. This was held to be legal by a jury of HIS peers. Thus we have the Fieger Precedent for a way for Democrats to mask large cash contributions.)

Only U.S. citizens are permitted to contribute to presidential campaigns. (ed: But in light of the Fieger Precedent, that is no barrier to the Democrats.)

===

What is driving the soul deep yearning for the Obamessiah here and overseas? Three words describe it best: Bush Derangement Syndrome

BDS - The expressed naked hatred of Bush and that fear of a McCain presidency as Bush 3. Flip the coin and an Obamessiah presidency is Jimmy Carter 2. I say he would be MUCH WORSE. He doesn't have a brother Billy Bob, which would at least give some comic relief (Remember Billy Beer?)

Europeans are being given a chance to express the BDS and possibly get a vote if the Dems can figure a way to manufacture enough fake expatriate voter registrations to allow for absentee ballots for all of them. Be alert for them to try to block ballots from overseas serving airmen, soldiers, sailors, and marines.

We have illegal aliens here who managed to get registered before the drivers license/motor voter easy portal to voter registration was clamped down. We have heard an estimate that up to 3% of the vote is illegals and it is enough to sway the results one way or the other. In this years election it almost doesn't matter because both sides are belly crawling panderers to illegals, and will give legal status to these criminals. I just want to block the illegal vote.

How will the illegals, that have managed to register to vote, accomplish the deed this year? Absentee Ballots, now that they are registered they can vote where no one can challenge their vote. The absentee ballot is the means that Democrats use to manufacture graveyard votes, pet registration votes, New England-Florida Snowbird votes. They are endlessly creative at ways to defraud the voting public. The absentee ballot offers the easiest means to manufacture large numbers of fraudulent votes. Electronic, non-paper, voting machines are right in the mix now that butterfly ballots are no longer used.

Technorati Tags:, , , , , , , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Health Care For Illegals - Part and Parcel of Obama and McCain Amnesty Dreams

Remember back to the big panderfests of the 2006-2007 legislative years when our elected representatives were clawing and scratching to see who could grovel the lowest before the illegals. Senate Bill 2611 was one of the results. We have the list of all those who voted for it. Obama and McCain are on the list. Both voted to give social security to illegals. The votes are part of public record. Obama and McCain are on record voting to give fake background checks to illegals, then allowing them to stay with benefits without having to wait for citizenship.

On this topic when you point a finger at one candidate, you must include the other.

http://www.newsmax.com/morris/obama_healthcare/2008/07/21/114994.html

Obama: Healthcare for Illegals

Nobody wants to die waiting in line - especially not behind someone who snuck in ahead of us.

Excerpts from the article by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann

posted: Monday, July 21, 2008 9:06 PM

Democrats' single most important domestic proposal — universal health insurance — may blow up in Barack Obama's face when voters are exposed to the deadly details.

Obama has said, proudly and often, "I am going to give health insurance to 47 million Americans who are now without coverage." But are they "Americans?"

That 47 million statistic includes illegal immigrants, who virtually all lack insurance. In fact, about one in four of those lacking insurance is here illegally.

Care for illegals is the biggest unmet medical need in our nation, and Obama's program targets it squarely. But do we really want to give them federally paid coverage equal to what US senators get, as Obama proposes? (...and as McCain also hopes? He is letting Obama be the lightning rod, but he too holds this as a fervent desire.)

Technorati Tags:, , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

The Obamessiah World Tour

The Obamessiah is touring the world to introduce himself as a world leader and get the world to vote for him, first as The PREZ, then as world government leader and savior.

He is accompanied by his MSM press secretaries Charles Gibson (ABC), Brian Williams (NBC), and Katie Couric (CBS). These three bring aboard the Obamessiah Campaign literally thousands of meda acolytes to tirelessly work the fields for him. CNN was excluded from Obamessiah's press secretary harem because they were so incestuously tied to the Clintons as to become known as the Clinton News Network. Clinton is out. Obamessiah is IN.

Excerpts from John Semmens - azconservative.org
http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm

Obamessiah's Press Secretary comments:

“This is definitely thinking ‘outside-the-box,’” gushed ABC News anchor Charles Gibson. “Lesser men may be content to be president of America. Senator Obama has a real chance to become king of the world.”

NBC anchor Brian Williams was similarly effusive. “We are on the brink of a new era for all mankind,” Williams said. “This is the earliest that a president-elect has ever started. It’s obvious that an Obama administration will ‘hit the ground running.’ I am so very fortunate to be allowed to document this historic occasion.”

“He called me ‘sweetie,’” CBS News anchor Katie Couric giddily boasted. “I get goose bumps remembering the moment it happened. I felt like I was Mary Magdelin.”

Obamessiah leads in world polling, a shoo-in to be elected

Polls in several European states show Obama has a substantial lead over presidential rival Senator John McCain (R-Ariz). Seventy percent of Italians, 67 percent of Germans, and 65 percent of the French say they will vote for Obama.

===

note: See the John Semmens archive for the full text that was excerpted and for other columns he has written.

Technorati Tags:, , , , , , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Gasoline and Diesel Prices... Do you feel like you've been raped?

Do you have a choice? Can you just park your car and walk to work, or take public transportation? Most of us can NOT!

Pundits like Rush Limbaugh and others pooh-pooh the idea that speculators are driving the price of gas at the pump.

I just did a quick drive around my local area to see what the posted prices for regular gas are. Within a couple miles of where I am typing this from, the low price was $4.22 and the high price is $4.25. A couple weeks ago we had at some of these stations selling it for $4.12 so there has not been a huge amount of movement, but it has been upward regardless.

But have you noticed how prices shoot up overnight at the slightest hint of anything affecting oil, not just the supply? Speculation? Who is speculating?

When oil prices go down, gas prices stay up with hints that the overnight increased (gouge) price may slowly fall over the coming weeks.

Gas prices follow (and even anticipate) oil prices upward movement but not when they fall, so you figure out, is there gouging going on, and who is gouging who. Follow the money... who is making "record prifits" while the country suffers? It is not like we have a choice.

One thing is certain, our high gasoline prices are pleasing to the Democrat controlled congress. 10 years ago Der Schlickmeister vetoed oil exploration in ANWR and off the continental shelf when we could have been drilling and producing now. Now they say that we can't drill our way out of the current crisis. Yes we can but with the Democrats, everything is a crisis and it is pleasing to them They are happiest when the country is suffering.


http://www.rogueriver.tzo.com/media/cartoonz/ramirez/toon071608.gif

http://www.rogueriver.tzo.com/media/cartoonz/ramirez/toon062508.gif

An excerpt from:
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/pweyrich/2008/pmw_07091.shtml

A Time To Drill
By Paul M. Weyrich
July 9, 2008

Liberals have come up with two mantras which we hear on every talk show, in every press conference and in every speech addressing the high cost of gasoline.

[1] The first mantra is that it will take at least 10, maybe 30 years before we see a drop of oil coming from the ground at the aforementioned sites.

On the first point, correspondent Ken Wood pointed out that Larry Kudlow recently featured on his television show James T. Hackett, President and CEO of Anadarko Petroleum Company. Whereas some liberals are saying it could take 30 years for the oil to be available, Hackett said it would take two or three years, depending upon where the oil was drilled. Indeed, I saw one oil exploration expert on Fox News Channel who said that if the right equipment were available it would take only one year to get the first oil since the oil companies know exactly where the oil is located in the outer Continental Shelf. One oil shale expert told proponents of drilling in the House of Representatives that the first 800 million barrels of oil from shale could be available in two or three years. The remaining estimated two trillion barrels of oil from shale would take longer to have ready because they would be more difficult to extricate. But the initial 800 million barrels would help the U.S. economy.

[2] The second mantra is that greedy oil companies already have 86 million acres of leases provided by the Federal Government. They only want more leases to satisfy their greed.

On the second point, I received two different answers. Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK), who used to be in the oil business, said the reason oil companies are not drilling on the 86 million acres is that there is no substantial oil available on those lands to make drilling economically viable. He said the government only permits exploration on those leased lands, so oil companies have explored them and found that they would produce little. The second answer came from Hackett. He said the federal government is, in effect, guilty of fraud. They accept the lease money and the annual rents but have refused to grant permission to drill there. He implied that some oil had been found that would be worthwhile to extract but since they cannot drill the consumer sees no benefits. Either way, to accuse oil companies of greed is an unfounded assertion.

Technorati Tags:, , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

Sunday, July 13, 2008

Do Visits to Iraq Equal Perspective? Obama Says No

Obama already has all he needs by reading reports from the liiberal MSM plus polls to establish a liberal baseline.

Any other information is trumped by all this in the liberal mind.

Why would Obama want to pollute his mind with the truth of actual information gathered on-the-ground?

cross posted from:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/ 2008/07/ do-visits-to-ir.html

Do Visits to Iraq Equal Perspective? Obama Says No

July 13, 2008 7:06 PM

ABC News' Sunlen Miller reports: Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., argued in San Diego today that just because Sen. John McCain has made multiple visits to Iraq, that does not mean that he has the correct perspective on the region.

"John McCain has been in Congress 25 years, no doubt about that. If this is a longevity measure, then John McCain wins," Obama said to reporters. "I'll recall the visit he made last year in which he was surrounded by helicopters and SWAT teams and came back and reported how safe everything was in Baghdad. You know, I don't think that that was indicative of what was actually happening on the ground at that time."

Obama is heading to Iraq later this month for what will be only his second visit to the country -– compared to McCain’s eight trips.

In response, McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds says, ""If Barack Obama believes that visiting Iraq and meeting with commanders will not give him any new perspective, then we can only assume he's going just to smile for the cameras."

Obama shot down the question that the disproportionate number of visits has left him with a lack of knowledge about the region -– citing past positions he's taken about the Iraq war.

[ed: Like a position that The Yellow Cake Dems Said Didn't Exist has been removed and shipped out to a safe processing facility, and that Bush lied as an excuse to invade Iraq? I am still waiting for a Democrat response to the report of 550 metric tons of yellow cake uranium being removed from Sadddam's nuke facility.]

Visit ABC News Political Radar to read the whole article

Technorati Tags:, , , ,
Generated By